
|
1933 Sieger Odin v. Stolzenfels Z.Pr
Odin v. Stolzenfels Z.Pr SZ#
406023 Breeder: J. Breitbach;
Oberlahnstein Born: April 7th,
1930
|
|
|
1925 Sgr. Klodo v. Boxberg |
|
V Curt v. Haerzog-Hedan SchH |
|
Bärbel
von der Halskappe PH |
Odin v. Stolzenfels Z.Pr |
|
Mohr v Secretainerie SchH I |
|
V Bella v. Jagdschloss Platte ZPr |
|
|
Vora v Stolzenfels |
|
Most Important Progeny:
Ferdl v.d. Secretainerie SchH
Ch. Dewet v.d. Starrenburg
V Odin vom qrunen Eck
V Sigbert Heidegrund
Arno von der Schwabenheimat
|
"Like his sire Odin gave long coats
but his influence was mainly for good. It s a pity that Klodo
'blood' was not widely spread via Odin and not simply Utz v Haus
Schutting because this might have helped to correct such serious faults
as short forelegs. Odin, like his father, went to Japan, doubtless
to undo the damage of the two previous Siegers. Little of his
'blood' reached Britain."
~Author Unknown
|
"In an effort to diminish the Utz influence without losing the
general type that he had given them, a lot of German breeders were going to Odin von Stolzenfels. Progeny numbers
were no longer available from this point. Of course he was also the Sieger which
would have given him more popularity. He not only was not warned against using
with the Utz lines but did not exhibit the same problems, it was a natural. They
did not let this one get away. He showed a lot of the Jungtell good things.
Short strong backs, good rear angulation, good heads and strong sound
temperament were his contribution.
"...inbred Odin Stolzenfels
line, and with it, size was not a factor. Both the latter combinations fit into
North American new foundations. With the inbred Stolzenfels came extreme rear
angulation. These rears were too extreme for Germany but were welcome in North
America"
~Garrett Gordon
Author of German Shepherd Dog History |
|
|